People of Michigan v. Leo Duwayne Ackley

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 4, 2020
Docket158455
StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Leo Duwayne Ackley (People of Michigan v. Leo Duwayne Ackley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People of Michigan v. Leo Duwayne Ackley, (Mich. 2020).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

November 4, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

158455 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 158455 COA: 336063 Calhoun CC: 2011-003642-FC LEO DUWAYNE ACKLEY, a/k/a LEO DUANE ACKLEY, JR., a/k/a LEO DUWAYNE ACKLEY, II, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of October 17, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v McFarlane (Docket No. 158259). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been denied in People v McFarlane on May 15, 2020, 505 Mich 1059 (2020), the application is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals. We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of its analysis of the expert testimony presented at trial in light of McFarlane. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting). For the reasons given in my concurring statement in People v McFarlane, 505 Mich 1059 (2020), I would deny leave to appeal.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 4, 2020 p1028 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People of Michigan v. Leo Duwayne Ackley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-leo-duwayne-ackley-mich-2020.