People of Michigan v. Kris Edward Siterlet

Michigan Supreme Court

People of Michigan v. Kris Edward Siterlet

DecidedSeptember 12, 2013

Docket146713

StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Kris Edward Siterlet (People of Michigan v. Kris Edward Siterlet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Kris Edward Siterlet, (Mich. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 12, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 146713 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 146713 COA: 308080 Clare CC: 10-004061-FH KRIS EDWARD SITERLET, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the defendant is entitled to any relief on his claim that the trial court lacked authority to sentence him as a fourth habitual offender, MCL 769.12, due to an invalid post-trial amendment of the notice of intent to seek sentence enhancement, MCL 769.13(1), and where the defendant failed to timely object to the amendment or to his sentencing as a fourth habitual offender; and (2) whether the Court of Appeals correctly analyzed the unpreserved error in this case under “plain error” standards. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 12, 2013 s0911 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 12, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 146713 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 146713 COA: 308080 Clare CC: 10-004061-FH KRIS EDWARD SITERLET, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the defendant is entitled to any relief on his claim that the trial court lacked authority to sentence him as a fourth habitual offender, MCL 769.12, due to an invalid post-trial amendment of the notice of intent to seek sentence enhancement, MCL 769.13(1), and where the defendant failed to timely object to the amendment or to his sentencing as a fourth habitual offender; and (2) whether the Court of Appeals correctly analyzed the unpreserved error in this case under “plain error” standards. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 12, 2013 s0911 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

People of Michigan v. Kris Edward Siterlet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-kris-edward-siterlet-mich-2013.