People of Michigan v. Kino Dominque Christian

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 28, 2021
Docket162354
StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Kino Dominque Christian (People of Michigan v. Kino Dominque Christian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People of Michigan v. Kino Dominque Christian, (Mich. 2021).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 28, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

162354 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano 162355 Richard H. Bernstein 162374 Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 162354 COA: 348807 Genesee CC: 08-022018-FC KINO DOMINIQUE CHRISTIAN, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 162355 COA: 348753 Genesee CC: 08-022016-FC JOSHUN EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 162374 COA: 349585 Genesee CC: 08-022017-FC C’QUAN MICHAEL HINTON, Defendant-Appellant.

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the October 22, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the applications. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellants shall each file a supplemental brief addressing whether the lower courts erred by holding that the suppressed October 16, 2007 interview transcript was not material to their guilt such that they were not entitled to relief under Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83, 87 (1963), and People v Chenault, 495 Mich 142, 149-150, 155 (2014). 2

Additionally, appellant Hinton shall address his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The appellants’ briefs shall be filed by September 27, 2021, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. In the briefs, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with each of the appellant’s briefs. A reply, if any, must be filed by each appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The total time allowed for oral argument shall be 50 minutes: 30 minutes for the appellants, to be divided at their discretion, and 20 minutes for the appellee. MCR 7.314(B)(2).

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 28, 2021 a0525 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
People v. Chenault
845 N.W.2d 731 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People of Michigan v. Kino Dominque Christian, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-kino-dominque-christian-mich-2021.