People of Michigan v. Kareem Dale Rhodes
This text of People of Michigan v. Kareem Dale Rhodes (People of Michigan v. Kareem Dale Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 30, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 146787 & (37) Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 146787 COA: 308107 Macomb CC: 2004-002865-FC KAREEM DALE RHODES, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion to expand the record is DENIED as moot, because the transcripts are already a part of the record on appeal. The application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 30, 2013 s0722 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People of Michigan v. Kareem Dale Rhodes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-kareem-dale-rhodes-mich-2013.