People of Michigan v. John Henry Cistrunk

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 28, 2016·No. 151069·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 28, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

151069 & (18)(25) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151069 COA: 322827 Wayne CC: 08-018426-FC

JOHN HENRY CISTRUNK, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED to the extent that the additional ground for appeal is considered. The application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2014 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion for peremptory reversal is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 28, 2016

a0620 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of Michigan v. John Henry Cistrunk, (Mich. 2016).

People of Michigan v. John Henry Cistrunk (People of Michigan v. John Henry Cistrunk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.