People of Michigan v. Jimmy Earl McCaskill
This text of People of Michigan v. Jimmy Earl McCaskill (People of Michigan v. Jimmy Earl McCaskill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 29, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
149347 & (66) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Justices Cross-Appellee, v SC: 149347 COA: 312409 Wayne CC: 11-008725-FC JIMMY EARL MCCASKILL, Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 1, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross- appellant are considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to reconsider whether any error in admitting the police officer’s identification testimony was harmless. The Court of Appeals found that the error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. That standard applies to preserved constitutional questions. People v Carines, 460 Mich 750 (1999). For nonconstitutional preserved error, a defendant has the burden of establishing a miscarriage of justice under a “more probable than not” standard. People v Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999). If the Court of Appeals determines that the error was harmless, it shall consider the remaining issues presented by the defendant on appeal. In all other respects, the applications are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 29, 2014 p0721 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People of Michigan v. Jimmy Earl McCaskill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-jimmy-earl-mccaskill-mich-2014.