People of Michigan v. Jason Brent Keister

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 2020·No. 159912·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 2, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159912(63) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellee, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices

v SC: 159912 COA: 340931

JASON BRENT KEISTER, Van Buren CC: 2016-020783-FC Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 27, 2020 order is considered. We MODIFY the order, which now states:

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment holding that the admission of testimony from Dr. Angela May that “there was a high likelihood of abuse” was not plain error. See People v Keister, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued May 16, 2019 (Docket No. 340931) at 5-6. Her testimony was plainly contrary to People v Smith, 425 Mich 98 (1986), People v Peterson, 450 Mich 349 (1995), and People v Thorpe, 504 Mich 230 (2019). We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of whether the prejudice prong of the plain-error test was satisfied, and, if so, whether reversal of the defendant’s convictions is warranted. See People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 763-764 (1999). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

In all other respects, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that further reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 2, 2020

a0630 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of Michigan v. Jason Brent Keister, (Mich. 2020).

People of Michigan v. Jason Brent Keister (People of Michigan v. Jason Brent Keister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Peterson
537 N.W.2d 857 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1995)
People v. Carines
597 N.W.2d 130 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1999)
People v. Smith
387 N.W.2d 814 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1986)