People of Michigan v. Jacob Langston-Porter Labelle

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 25, 2019·No. 159573·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 25, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159573 & (14)(18)(19) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

v SC: 159573 COA: 347421 Washtenaw CC: 18-000596-FC JACOB LANGSTON-PORTER LABELLE, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions for miscellaneous relief and immediate consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the defendant’s application under MCR 7.205 in light of the concern articulated in People v Yost, 468 Mich 122, 124 n 2 (2003). The motion to stay filed in this Court is DENIED without foreclosing the defendant’s ability to seek a stay from the Court of Appeals.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

MCCORMACK, C.J., did not participate due to her preexisting relationship with a party.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 25, 2019

b1022

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of Michigan v. Jacob Langston-Porter Labelle, (Mich. 2019).

People of Michigan v. Jacob Langston-Porter Labelle (People of Michigan v. Jacob Langston-Porter Labelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Yost
659 N.W.2d 604 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2003)