People of Michigan v. Israel a Velez

Michigan Supreme Court

People of Michigan v. Israel a Velez

DecidedMarch 31, 2017

Docket152778

StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Israel a Velez (People of Michigan v. Israel a Velez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Israel a Velez, (Mich. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 31, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

152778 Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Joan L. Larsen, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 152778 COA: 315209 Alger CC: 2012-001997-FC ISRAEL A. VELEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). We further ORDER the Alger Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint attorney Mitchell T. Foster, if feasible, to represent the defendant in this Court. If this appointment is not feasible, the trial court shall, within the same time frame, appoint other counsel to represent the defendant in this Court.

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel, or of the ruling that the defendant is not entitled to appointed counsel, addressing: (1) whether the defendant’s claim regarding the preliminary sentence evaluation under People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 276 (1993), is properly before this Court, given his failure to file a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court, see MCR 6.310(D), and notwithstanding the prosecutor’s failure to raise and preserve this issue, see People v Oliver, 417 Mich 366, 385-386 n 17 (1983); and (2) if so, whether the trial court failed to impose a sentence in accordance with the preliminary evaluation. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 31, 2017 a0328 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 31, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

152778 Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Joan L. Larsen, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 152778 COA: 315209 Alger CC: 2012-001997-FC ISRAEL A. VELEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). We further ORDER the Alger Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint attorney Mitchell T. Foster, if feasible, to represent the defendant in this Court. If this appointment is not feasible, the trial court shall, within the same time frame, appoint other counsel to represent the defendant in this Court.

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel, or of the ruling that the defendant is not entitled to appointed counsel, addressing: (1) whether the defendant’s claim regarding the preliminary sentence evaluation under People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 276 (1993), is properly before this Court, given his failure to file a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court, see MCR 6.310(D), and notwithstanding the prosecutor’s failure to raise and preserve this issue, see People v Oliver, 417 Mich 366, 385-386 n 17 (1983); and (2) if so, whether the trial court failed to impose a sentence in accordance with the preliminary evaluation. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 31, 2017 a0328 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

People of Michigan v. Israel a Velez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-israel-a-velez-mich-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack