People of Michigan v. Hamin Lorenzo Dixon

Michigan Supreme Court

People of Michigan v. Hamin Lorenzo Dixon

DecidedApril 9, 2021

Docket162221

StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Hamin Lorenzo Dixon (People of Michigan v. Hamin Lorenzo Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Hamin Lorenzo Dixon, (Mich. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 9, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

162221 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 162221 COA: 349631 Chippewa CC: 17-003294-FH HAMIN LORENZO DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

We further ORDER the Chippewa Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint counsel to represent the defendant in this Court.

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel addressing: (1) whether attempted violation of MCL 800.283a necessarily requires a score of 25 points for Offense Variable (OV) 19; and if not, (2) whether there is sufficient evidence to score OV 19 at 25 points on this record. In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 9, 2021 b0406 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 9, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

162221 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 162221 COA: 349631 Chippewa CC: 17-003294-FH HAMIN LORENZO DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

We further ORDER the Chippewa Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint counsel to represent the defendant in this Court.

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel addressing: (1) whether attempted violation of MCL 800.283a necessarily requires a score of 25 points for Offense Variable (OV) 19; and if not, (2) whether there is sufficient evidence to score OV 19 at 25 points on this record. In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 9, 2021 b0406 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

People of Michigan v. Hamin Lorenzo Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-hamin-lorenzo-dixon-mich-2021.