People of Michigan v. Edwin Dewayne Richmond

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 28, 2010·No. 136648·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 28, 2010 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Rehearing No. 563 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 1 December 8 Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

136648

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 136648 COA: 277012 Wayne CC: 06-013878-01 EDWIN DEWAYNE RICHMOND, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________________ AMENDMENT TO ORDER On order of the Court, this Court’s June 28, 2010 order is amended to correct the third paragraph to read as follows:

Moreover, we note that the prosecutor has non-frivolous arguments such that she can appropriately seek to reinstate her case. The comments to MRPC 3.1 define “frivolous” as “an action taken primarily for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring a person.” In light of the intervening change in the law in Keller, in view of the fact that the prosecutor has received a unanimous Court of Appeals decision in her favor, and in view of the clarifying nature of the instant decision, we believe that reasonable arguments remain available to the prosecutor to explain why reinstatement of charges under these circumstances is appropriate.

The remainder of the order and the separate statements of the Justices remain unchanged.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 28, 2010 _________________________________________ Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of Michigan v. Edwin Dewayne Richmond, (Mich. 2010).

People of Michigan v. Edwin Dewayne Richmond (People of Michigan v. Edwin Dewayne Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.