People of Michigan v. Dominique Arnett Ramsey Jr
This text of 921 N.W.2d 538 (People of Michigan v. Dominique Arnett Ramsey Jr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment reversing the Saginaw Circuit Court's March 3, 2016 decision to grant a new trial on grounds that the verdict was against the great weight of the evidence, and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on reconsideration granted. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court had abused its discretion in granting a new trial "for the same reasons" as it erred in deciding that the evidence was insufficient to convict the defendant of conspiracy, and found that "the record evidence did not preponderate against the jury's verdict to the extent that a miscarriage of justice has occurred." Though there may be sufficient evidence to convict when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecutor, that does not render a decision on the great weight of the evidence an abuse of discretion. See
People v. Lemmon
,
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
921 N.W.2d 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-dominique-arnett-ramsey-jr-mich-2019.