People of Michigan v. Dexter Burrell Taylor

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 24, 2020
Docket159612
StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Dexter Burrell Taylor (People of Michigan v. Dexter Burrell Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People of Michigan v. Dexter Burrell Taylor, (Mich. 2020).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 24, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159612 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159612 COA: 340028 Wayne CC: 16-007780-FC DEXTER BURRELL TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

We further ORDER the Wayne Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint William Branch, if feasible, to represent the defendant in this Court. If this appointment is not feasible, the trial court shall, within the same time frame, appoint other counsel to represent the defendant in this Court.

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel addressing: (1) whether the other-acts evidence offered to show a common plan, scheme, or system contained a “striking similarity” to the charged act as required by People v Denson, 500 Mich 385, 403 (2017); (2) whether the other-acts evidence was admissible under the “doctrine of chances,” see People v Mardlin, 487 Mich 609, 616-617 (2010); and (3) if the evidence was not offered for a proper purpose, whether its admission was harmless.

In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant 2

within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 24, 2020 p0121 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mardlin
790 N.W.2d 607 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People of Michigan v. Dexter Burrell Taylor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-dexter-burrell-taylor-mich-2020.