People of Michigan v. Darrin Scott Lapine

Michigan Supreme Court

People of Michigan v. Darrin Scott Lapine

DecidedOctober 1, 2014

Docket148274

StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Darrin Scott Lapine (People of Michigan v. Darrin Scott Lapine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Darrin Scott Lapine, (Mich. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 1, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

148274 & (34) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 148274 COA: 313548 Chippewa CC: 10-000378-FC DARRIN SCOTT LAPINE, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the “motion for immediate consideration to obtain/transfer the Court of Appeals file and video to the Supreme Court for full review” is DENIED as moot because the Court has already received those items. The application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Chippewa County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall address the defendant’s assertion that the state courts lacked subject matter jurisdiction in this case because he is Indian and the sentencing offenses occurred within the jurisdiction of the federal government or the Bay Mills Indian Community.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 1, 2014 p0924 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 1, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

148274 & (34) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 148274 COA: 313548 Chippewa CC: 10-000378-FC DARRIN SCOTT LAPINE, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the “motion for immediate consideration to obtain/transfer the Court of Appeals file and video to the Supreme Court for full review” is DENIED as moot because the Court has already received those items. The application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Chippewa County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall address the defendant’s assertion that the state courts lacked subject matter jurisdiction in this case because he is Indian and the sentencing offenses occurred within the jurisdiction of the federal government or the Bay Mills Indian Community.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 1, 2014 p0924 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

People of Michigan v. Darrin Scott Lapine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-darrin-scott-lapine-mich-2014.