People of Michigan v. Clarence William Borns

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 2021·No. 160998·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160998 & (27)(28)(29)(35) Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 160998 COA: 350898 Wayne CC: 13-002129-FC

CLARENCE WILLIAM BORNS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of September 8, 2020, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motions to amend, to remand, to appoint counsel, and to supplement are DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2021

a0421 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of Michigan v. Clarence William Borns, (Mich. 2021).

People of Michigan v. Clarence William Borns (People of Michigan v. Clarence William Borns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.