People of Michigan v. Christopher L Tull

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 2014
Docket147401
StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Christopher L Tull (People of Michigan v. Christopher L Tull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People of Michigan v. Christopher L Tull, (Mich. 2014).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

147401 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 147401 COA: 311876 Macomb CC: 1994-002418-FC CHRISTOPHER L. TULL, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Macomb Circuit Court for reissuance of the defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentence. The record makes clear that the failure to perfect an appeal of right was solely the fault of the defendant’s trial counsel, who did not fulfill his promise in open court to file the necessary paperwork to begin the appellate process. Accordingly, the defendant was deprived of his appeal of right as a result of constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. See Roe v Flores- Ortega, 528 US 470, 477; 120 S Ct 1029; 145 L Ed 2d 985 (2000); Peguero v United States, 526 US 23, 28; 119 S Ct 961; 143 L Ed 2d 18 (1999).

We further ORDER the Macomb Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint counsel to represent the defendant on appeal.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 28, 2014 h0224 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peguero v. United States
526 U.S. 23 (Supreme Court, 1999)
Roe v. Flores-Ortega
528 U.S. 470 (Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People of Michigan v. Christopher L Tull, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-christopher-l-tull-mich-2014.