People of Michigan v. Charles Earl Varnado Jr
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 24, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman
Brian K. Zahra
151897 & (15) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein
Joan L. Larsen,
Justices
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v SC: 151897 COA: 326896 Wayne CC: 13-002760-FC
CHARLES EARL VARNADO, JR., Defendant-Appellant.
_____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the defendant’s April 14, 2015 delayed application for leave to appeal under the standard applicable to direct appeals. The defendant’s former appellate attorney failed to timely file in the trial court a motion to withdraw as counsel, and failed to file in the Court of Appeals, on direct review, a delayed application for leave to appeal within the deadlines set forth in MCR 7.205(G)(3). Accordingly, the defendant was deprived of his direct appeal as a result of constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. See Roe v Flores-Ortega, 528 US 470, 477; 120 S Ct 1209; 145 L Ed 2d 985 (2000); Peguero v United States, 526 US 23, 28; 119 S Ct 961; 143 L Ed 2d 18 (1999). The motion to remand to the trial court is DENIED.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 24, 2016
a0516 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People of Michigan v. Charles Earl Varnado Jr (People of Michigan v. Charles Earl Varnado Jr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.