People of Michigan v. Carl Rene Bruner II

928 N.W.2d 220
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People of Michigan v. Carl Rene Bruner II. Read the opinion of the Court — 501 Mich. 220
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 14, 2019·No. SC: 158545; COA: 325730·Published

Opinions

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), and in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for a new trial. The Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the prosecution established that the confrontation violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Reviewing the record de novo, we cannot conclude that admission of Westley Webb's testimony-the only evidence that placed a gun in the defendant's hand-"did not tip the scale in favor of the prosecution and contribute to the jury's verdict." People v. Anderson , 446 Mich. 392 , 407, 521 N.W.2d 538 (1994). Instead, it seems "reasonable to believe that this evidence affected the jury's decision to convict." Id.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of Michigan v. Carl Rene Bruner II, 928 N.W.2d 220 (Mich. 2019).

928 N.W.2d 220 (People of Michigan v. Carl Rene Bruner II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. California
386 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Carines
597 N.W.2d 130 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1999)
People v. Anderson
521 N.W.2d 538 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1994)
People v. Nowack
614 N.W.2d 78 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)