People of Michigan v. Cadence Michael Pohly
This text of People of Michigan v. Cadence Michael Pohly (People of Michigan v. Cadence Michael Pohly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 27, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 155187 David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 155187 COA: 333262 Ottawa CC: 10-001941-DL CADENCE MICHAEL POHLY, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of People v Tucker (Docket No. 152798) and People v Snyder (Docket No. 153696) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 27, 2018 s0723 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People of Michigan v. Cadence Michael Pohly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-cadence-michael-pohly-mich-2018.