People of Michigan v. Amdebirhan Abdere Alemu

Michigan Court of Appeals

People of Michigan v. Amdebirhan Abdere Alemu

DecidedJuly 7, 2015

Docket320560

StatusUnpublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Amdebirhan Abdere Alemu (People of Michigan v. Amdebirhan Abdere Alemu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Amdebirhan Abdere Alemu, (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED July 7, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellee,

v No. 320560 Kent Circuit Court AMDEBIRHAN ABDERE ALEMU, LC No. 13-000380-FH

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BECKERING, P.J., and MARKEY and SHAPIRO, JJ.

MARKEY, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the trial court’s decision in this matter because I do not believe a full review of the record supports a finding that the trial court’s holding constituted an abuse of discretion—a high hurdle for this court to achieve. The trial judge in this matter is extremely experienced and certainly well familiar with the applicable law. That he may have originally misunderstood one fact of defendant’s case does not lead me to conclude either that he did not comprehend either the scope of his discretion, the application of the law or the ramifications of his deciding to sentence defendant as he did. We do not have the ability to perceive the subjective factors that may also affect a judge’s sentencing, such as demeanor, attitude, voice inflections, etc., which is another reason why finding an abuse of discretion in a situation such is this is even more difficult. Consequently, I would affirm.

/s/ Jane E. Markey

-1-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED July 7, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellee,

v No. 320560 Kent Circuit Court AMDEBIRHAN ABDERE ALEMU, LC No. 13-000380-FH

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BECKERING, P.J., and MARKEY and SHAPIRO, JJ.

MARKEY, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the trial court’s decision in this matter because I do not believe a full review of the record supports a finding that the trial court’s holding constituted an abuse of discretion—a high hurdle for this court to achieve. The trial judge in this matter is extremely experienced and certainly well familiar with the applicable law. That he may have originally misunderstood one fact of defendant’s case does not lead me to conclude either that he did not comprehend either the scope of his discretion, the application of the law or the ramifications of his deciding to sentence defendant as he did. We do not have the ability to perceive the subjective factors that may also affect a judge’s sentencing, such as demeanor, attitude, voice inflections, etc., which is another reason why finding an abuse of discretion in a situation such is this is even more difficult. Consequently, I would affirm.

/s/ Jane E. Markey

-1-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

People of Michigan v. Amdebirhan Abdere Alemu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-amdebirhan-abdere-alemu-michctapp-2015.