People of Michigan v. Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse

Michigan Supreme Court

People of Michigan v. Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse

DecidedSeptember 30, 2019

Docket156900

StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse (People of Michigan v. Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse, (Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 30, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 156900 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Megan K. Cavanagh, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 156900 COA: 318329 Wayne CC: 11-011939-FC ALEXANDER JEREMY STEANHOUSE, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 4, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the December 5, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Dixon-Bey (Docket No. 156746). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been denied in Dixon-Bey on July 29, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment remanding this case to the trial court solely for resentencing. The Court of Appeals determined that only one of three reasons articulated by the trial court for departing from the sentencing guidelines was valid, that it was unclear whether it would have departed solely on that basis, and that its reasoning for the extent of departure was difficult to ascertain. Rather than remanding only for resentencing, the Court of Appeals should have remanded for the trial court to either resentence or to further articulate its reasons for departure. See People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 258-259 (2003). We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to either issue an order further articulating its reasons for guidelines departure, or to resentence the defendant.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 30, 2019 s0923 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 30, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 156900 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Megan K. Cavanagh, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 156900 COA: 318329 Wayne CC: 11-011939-FC ALEXANDER JEREMY STEANHOUSE, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 4, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the December 5, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Dixon-Bey (Docket No. 156746). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been denied in Dixon-Bey on July 29, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment remanding this case to the trial court solely for resentencing. The Court of Appeals determined that only one of three reasons articulated by the trial court for departing from the sentencing guidelines was valid, that it was unclear whether it would have departed solely on that basis, and that its reasoning for the extent of departure was difficult to ascertain. Rather than remanding only for resentencing, the Court of Appeals should have remanded for the trial court to either resentence or to further articulate its reasons for departure. See People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 258-259 (2003). We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to either issue an order further articulating its reasons for guidelines departure, or to resentence the defendant.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 30, 2019 s0923 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

People of Michigan v. Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-alexander-jeremy-steanhouse-mich-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack