People of Michigan v. Akei Levorn Chapman

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided July 21, 2015·No. 321000·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED July 21, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellee,

v No. 321000 Wayne Circuit Court AKEI LEVORN CHAPMAN, LC No. 13-009215-FC

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: HOEKSTRA, P.J., and JANSEN and METER, JJ.

HOEKSTRA, P.J., (concurring).

I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm defendant’s convictions. I write separately because, although I agree with the majority that any misconduct by the prosecutor was not outcome determinative and that defense counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s remarks, I am persuaded that the prosecutor impermissibly expressed personal beliefs, unsupported by the evidence, when the prosecutor categorically asserted that “normal” and “healthy” friendships cannot exist between teenagers and adults. See People v Bahoda, 448 Mich 261, 282-283, 286-287; 531 NW2d 659 (1995); People v Watson, 245 Mich App 572, 588; 629 NW2d 411 (2001).

/s/ Joel P. Hoekstra

-1-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of Michigan v. Akei Levorn Chapman, (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).

People of Michigan v. Akei Levorn Chapman (People of Michigan v. Akei Levorn Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bahoda
531 N.W.2d 659 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1995)
People v. Watson
629 N.W.2d 411 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2001)