People of ex rel. Alsaifullah v. New York State Division of Parole

269 A.D.2d 550, 703 N.Y.S.2d 740, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), entered July 6, 1998, which denied the writ and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[551]*551The 1997 amendments to 9 NYCRR 8005.20 (c), as applied to the petitioner, did not impose constitutionally impermissible ex post facto penalties since they are not laws within the meaning of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution (see, US Const, art I, §§ 9, 10; People ex rel. Johnson v Russi, 258 AD2d 346).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of ex rel. Alsaifullah v. New York State Division of Parole, 269 A.D.2d 550, 703 N.Y.S.2d 740, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 550 (People of ex rel. Alsaifullah v. New York State Division of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D'Joy v. New York State Division of Parole
127 F. Supp. 2d 433 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Matthews v. New York State Division of Parole
276 A.D.2d 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People ex rel. Santoro v. Hollins
273 A.D.2d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)