People of City of Roseville v. Stross
759 N.W.2d 371, 483 Mich. 883, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 467
This text of 759 N.W.2d 371 (People of City of Roseville v. Stross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People of City of Roseville v. Stross, 759 N.W.2d 371, 483 Mich. 883, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 467 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
PEOPLE OF the CITY OF ROSEVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward STROSS, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's September 10, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Pearson
759 N.W.2d 371 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
759 N.W.2d 371, 483 Mich. 883, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-city-of-roseville-v-stross-mich-2009.