People ex relat. Bacon v. Wilson

New York Supreme Court

People ex relat. Bacon v. Wilson

5 Johns. 368

DecidedFebruary 15, 1810

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Johns. 368 (People ex relat. Bacon v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex relat. Bacon v. Wilson, 5 Johns. 368 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

Where an attorney refuses or neglects to pay over to his client the moneys he has collected for him, the court will grant a rule for the attorney to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him.

THE defendant having, as attorney, collected moneys of the complainant, and omitting, or refusing to pay them over, and these facts being verified by affidavit, The Court, on motion, ordered that the defendant show cause by the first day of the next term, why an attachment should not issue against him for not paying over the moneys collected by him, as attorney, to his client,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Where an attorney refuses or neglects to pay over to his client the moneys he has collected for him, the court will grant a rule for the attorney to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him.

THE defendant having, as attorney, collected moneys of the complainant, and omitting, or refusing to pay them over, and these facts being verified by affidavit, The Court, on motion, ordered that the defendant show cause by the first day of the next term, why an attachment should not issue against him for not paying over the moneys collected by him, as attorney, to his client,.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Johns. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-relat-bacon-v-wilson-nysupct-1810.