People ex rel. Zuckerman v. Molina

203 A.D.3d 731, 160 N.Y.S.3d 613, 2022 NY Slip Op 01304

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: March 2, 2022
• Docket: 2022-01080
• Status: Published

Opinion

People ex rel. Zuckerman v Molina (2022 NY Slip Op 01304)

People v Zuckerman

2022 NY Slip Op 01304

Decided on March 2, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 2, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
LARA J. GENOVESI
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2022-01080

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel.

v

Seth J. Zuckerman, on behalf of Jonathan Arroyo, appellant, Louis A. Molina, etc., et al., respondents.

Chaudhry Law PLLC, New York, NY (Seth J. Zuckerman pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Joy Kieras, and Nicholas Kyriacou of counsel), respondent pro se and for respondents Louis A. Molina and Warden, George R. Vierno Center.

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Jonathan Arroyo upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Kings County Indictment No. 71086/2021.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The bail determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).

The petitioner has failed to establish entitlement to relief pursuant to CPL 30.30(2)(a).

DILLON, J.P., DUFFY, GENOVESI and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court