People ex rel. Yaras v. Kinnaw
This text of 277 A.D.2d 815 (People ex rel. Yaras v. Kinnaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Albany Special Term of the Supreme Court, which confirmed the report of a referee in six certiorari proceedings and reduced the assessments in the year of 1948 upon relator’s property in the city of Albany. The finding of the Special Term on the question of overvaluation of relator’s property is sustained by the record. Its conclusion that the ratio of assessed value to full value in the tax district generally is 72.4% is open to substantially the same infirmities considered in People ex rel. Reynolds v. Kinnaw (276 App. Div. 718), and for this reason the order should be reversed. Order reversed, on the law and facts, and a new hearing ordered before an official referee to be designated by this court, with costs to abide the event. The referee is directed to report to this court solely on the question of inequality. The court hereby disapproves all findings on the issue of inequality. Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Foster, P. J., dissents. [See post, p. 1062.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-yaras-v-kinnaw-nyappdiv-1950.