People ex rel. Wunders v. Russi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Wunders v. Russi

200 A.D.2d 846, 608 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 233

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 200 A.D.2d 846 (People ex rel. Wunders v. Russi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Wunders v. Russi, 200 A.D.2d 846, 608 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Coutant, J.), entered March 24, 1993 in Broome County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

Supreme Court properly determined that petitioner was not entitled to habeas corpus relief. It was at petitioner’s request that the final parole revocation hearing was adjourned. Petitioner was therefore not denied his right to a timely final hearing. His remaining arguments have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Coutant, J.), entered March 24, 1993 in Broome County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

Supreme Court properly determined that petitioner was not entitled to habeas corpus relief. It was at petitioner’s request that the final parole revocation hearing was adjourned. Petitioner was therefore not denied his right to a timely final hearing. His remaining arguments have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 846, 608 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-wunders-v-russi-nyappdiv-1994.