People ex rel. Wright v. Judge of Superior Court
49 N.W. 925, 41 Mich. 726
Opinion
Although there was great delay in settling the bill of exceptions, it appears to have been from the inaction of the judge and not from the fault of the [727]*727party. The case therefore cannot be distinguished from other cases before decided, where parties have been deprived of their exceptions by circumstances beyond their control. The death of Judge Cochrane without acting upon the exceptions, made a new trial a matter of right.
Mandamus granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Wright v. Judge of Superior Court, 49 N.W. 925, 41 Mich. 726 (Mich. 1879).
49 N.W. 925 (People ex rel. Wright v. Judge of Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. National Shawmut Bank
84 N.E.2d 318 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1949)
People v. Mosley
197 N.W. 541 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
State v. Ricks
180 P. 257 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1919)
Dennis v. State
137 Tenn. 543 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1917)
School Dist. No. 38, Le Flore County v. School Dist. No. 92, Le Flore County
1914 OK 234 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Richardson v. State
89 P. 1027 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1907)
Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Holloway v. Cotton
17 Haw. 445 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1906)
Nelson v. Marshall
58 A. 793 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1904)
Henrichsen v. Smith
42 P. 486 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1896)
Kansas & Arkansas Valley Railroad v. Fitzhugh
33 S.W. 960 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1895)
Stirling v. Wagner
31 P. 1032 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1892)
Bass v. Swingley
42 Kan. 729 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)