People ex rel. Worden v. Judge of Manistee Circuit

33 Mich. 111, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 1
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 4, 1876·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Court

held that if any power existed after return made to the writ of error, to allow the bond to be filed nune pro tunc and operate a3 a supersedeas, it was in the supreme court, where the judgment had been removed, and”that the circuit court had no authority to make the order complained of.

"Writ granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Worden v. Judge of Manistee Circuit, 33 Mich. 111, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 1 (Mich. 1876).

33 Mich. 111 (People ex rel. Worden v. Judge of Manistee Circuit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hendricks v. McCausey
299 N.W. 847 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1941)
Coeling v. Barnard
124 N.W. 533 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Bock v. Sauk Center Grocery Co.
110 N.W. 257 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1907)
State v. Hilberg
61 P. 215 (Utah Supreme Court, 1900)