People ex rel. Wirt v. Budd

47 P. 594, 5 Cal. Unrep. 572
California Supreme Court·Decided January 19, 1897·No. S. F. No. 775·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application, on notice, for a peremptory writ of mandate to the governor of California to appoint two police commissioners for the city and county of San Francisco. The attorney general moves to dismiss the proceeding, upon the ground that the relator has received no authority to sue in the name of the people of the state, and that he is not himself a party beneficially interested (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1086), in any sense that distinguishes [573]*573him from other citizens of the state. The grounds of the motion are conceded, and the motion must he granted: Linden v. Supervisors, 45 Cal. 6; Ashe v. Supervisors, 71 Cal. 236, 16 Pac. 783; Colnon v. Orr, 71 Cal. 43, 11 Pac. 814; Marini v. Graham, 67 Cal. 130, 7 Pac. 442. Proceeding dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Wirt v. Budd, 47 P. 594, 5 Cal. Unrep. 572 (Cal. 1897).

47 P. 594 (People ex rel. Wirt v. Budd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linden v. Board of Supervisors
45 Cal. 6 (California Supreme Court, 1872)
Marini v. Graham
7 P. 442 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Colnon v. Orr
11 P. 814 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
Ashe v. Board of Supervisors
16 P. 783 (California Supreme Court, 1886)