Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People ex rel. Wilson v. Reilly

People ex rel. Wilson v. Reilly

297 A.D.2d 762, 747 N.Y.2d 783, 747 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8631
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 762 (People ex rel. Wilson v. Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Wilson v. Reilly, 297 A.D.2d 762, 747 N.Y.2d 783, 747 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People ex rel. Jones v Strak, 255 AD2d 612). Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People ex rel. Jones v. Strak
255 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 762, 747 N.Y.2d 783, 747 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-wilson-v-reilly-nyappdiv-2002.