People ex rel. Wilson v. Reilly
297 A.D.2d 762, 747 N.Y.2d 783, 747 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8631
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 2002·Published
Opinion
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People ex rel. Jones v Strak, 255 AD2d 612). Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Wilson v. Reilly, 297 A.D.2d 762, 747 N.Y.2d 783, 747 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 762 (People ex rel. Wilson v. Reilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People ex rel. Jones v. Strak
255 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)