People ex rel. Williamson v. Kuhlman

81 Misc. 2d 1038, 368 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2525
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 6, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 81 Misc. 2d 1038 (People ex rel. Williamson v. Kuhlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Williamson v. Kuhlman, 81 Misc. 2d 1038, 368 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2525 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1975).

Opinion

Benjamin Newberg, J.

Petitioner was declared delinquent on April 30, 1974 and at the present time is a resident at the Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center under the care and custody of the Drug Abuse Control Commission (D.A.C.C.). Petitioner was originally certified to D.A.C.C. for a period of 60 months on July 24, 1969.

It is conceded that petitioner, as an alleged aftercare violator, was not given a hearing before being violated from aftercare.

The issue raised by this proceeding presents a question as to whether the mandates in the ruling of Matter of Ball v Jones (43 AD2d 281, mod 36 NY2d 339) are retroactive.

On January 17, 1974 in Matter of Ball v Jones, the Supreme Court in the Fourth Department decided a hearing must be had before an addict can be violated and returned from aftercare to a resident status. This case was appealed to the Appellate Division and finally to the New York State Court of Appeals, which affirmed in modified form. The Court of Appeals affirmed as to the necessity of notice of charges and a hearing before a violation can be validly effective.

In view of the cases above referred to, the constitutional right to a hearing was in effect since January 17, 1974 and prior to the date that the petitioner was violated herein. In view of the above, the issue here as to any retroactive application is academic.

Writ is allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pannell v. Jones
329 N.E.2d 159 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Ball v. Jones
43 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 Misc. 2d 1038, 368 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-williamson-v-kuhlman-nysupct-1975.