People ex rel. Wilder v. C. C. Church
2 Wend. 262
Opinion
This is not a case in which the court will award an attachment. An attachment will issue for a rescue on mesne, but not on final process. The sheriff possessed as much power as the court can give him by the issuing of an attachment. He might have commanded what force he wanted to prevent the carrying off of the watch. Besides, he is entitled to his action against the defendant.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Wilder v. C. C. Church, 2 Wend. 262 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).
2 Wend. 262 (People ex rel. Wilder v. C. C. Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gates v. People
6 Ill. App. 383 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1880)
United States v. Seeley
27 F. Cas. 1010 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1844)