People ex rel. Wider v. Johnson

324 N.E.2d 722, 26 Ill. App. 3d 192, 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 1866
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 11, 1975
DocketNo. 74-369
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 324 N.E.2d 722 (People ex rel. Wider v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Wider v. Johnson, 324 N.E.2d 722, 26 Ill. App. 3d 192, 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 1866 (Ill. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Mr. JUSTICE KARNS

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Madison County finding defendant-appellant to be the father of plaintiff-appellee’s illegitimate child pursuant to the provisions of the Paternity Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 160%, par. 51 et seq.). The case was tried before the court sitting without a jury. Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish his paternity of the child by a preponderance of the evidence.

Section 6 of the Paternity Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 106%, par. 56) provides that both plaintiff and defendant are competent witnesses in a paternity action and that their credibility is to be determined by the trier of fact. Where the evidence presented by the plaintiff and defendant is contradictory, the trier of fact may believe one party and not the other. (Blackwell v. Welti, 46 Ill.App.2d 453, 197 N.E.2d 126 (1964).) Only where the trial court’s judgment is palpably contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence will this court reverse its judgment. People ex rel. Dalman v. O’Malley, 43 Ill.App.2d 95, 192 N.E.2d 489 (1963).

We have reviewed the entire record and find that the judgment of the court was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. We further find that no error of law appears of record and that an opinion in this cause would serve no precedential value. Pursuant to our powers under Supreme Court Rule 23 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 23), therefore, we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court.

Affirmed.

JONES, P. J., and G. MORAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virzint v. Beranek
456 N.E.2d 184 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1983)
People Ex Rel. Mathis v. Brown
358 N.E.2d 1160 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 N.E.2d 722, 26 Ill. App. 3d 192, 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 1866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-wider-v-johnson-illappct-1975.