People ex rel. Whitmarsh v. New-York Common Pleas

2 Wend. 263
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Wend. 263 (People ex rel. Whitmarsh v. New-York Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Whitmarsh v. New-York Common Pleas, 2 Wend. 263 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Opinion

Motion for a mandamus. A suit on recognizance of bail was commenced against G-. S. Bibby, as the manucaptor of C. A. Yandenheuvel. On the return of the process, the defendant obtained an order from the common pleas, enlarging the time to surrender until the next term of the court, on producing satisfactory evidence that Yandenheuvel was an imprisoned debtor within the limits of the jail in New-Haven, in the state of Connecticut; which order was enlarged from term to term until November, 1828, when it appearing that Vandenheuvel still remained a prisoner for debt at Nexv-Hayen, the court made an order staying the proceedings in the suit on the recognizance, and giving the defendant time to surrender him until the expiration of thirty days after his discharge from imprisonment. A motion was now made for a mandamus, directing the common pleas to vacate that rule, which was denied by the Court, the order of the common pleas being approved as correct and proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Way v. Wright
46 Mass. 380 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1843)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wend. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-whitmarsh-v-new-york-common-pleas-nysupct-1829.