People ex rel. Wheeler v. McMann
This text of 24 A.D.2d 786 (People ex rel. Wheeler v. McMann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, denying relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus without a hearing. In October, 1960, relator, represented by counsel, plead guilty to an indictment charging him with assault, first degree, and sodomy, first degree. In the instant proceeding he asserts that the indictment was defective and thus his plea a nullity. The use of short-form indictments is clearly constitutional (People v. Bogdanoff, 254 N. Y. 16) and since we find nothing jurisdietionally defective in the present indictment (cf. People v. Riforgiato, 19 A D 2d 132 and People v. Berkowitz, 14 Misc 2d 384, affd. 7 A D 2d 1031), any question of the sufficiency of the indictment should have been raised prior to judgment (People ex rel. Wysokowski v. Conboy, 19 A D 2d 663, mot. for lv. to app. den. 13 N Y 2d 597). Judgment 'affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.2d 786, 263 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-wheeler-v-mcmann-nyappdiv-1965.