People ex rel. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co. v. Woodbury

133 A.D. 503, 117 N.Y.S. 676, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2216
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 133 A.D. 503 (People ex rel. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co. v. Woodbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co. v. Woodbury, 133 A.D. 503, 117 N.Y.S. 676, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Cochrane, J.:

The motion to quash the writ of certiorari was based on the alleged fact that the writ was not allowed within four months after the assessment sought to be reviewed became, final. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2125.)

Section 45 of the Tax Law (Laws of 1896, chap. 90S, added by Laws of 1899, chap. 712, and amd. by Laws of 1900, chap. 254) provides as follows: ^An assessment of a special franchise by the. State Board of Tax Commissioners may be reviewed in the manner prescribed by article eleven. of this chapter, and. that article applies so far as practicable to such an assessment, in the same manner and with the same force and effect as if the assessment had been made by local assessors; a-petition for a writ of certiorari to review the assessment must be presented within fifteen days after the completion and filing of the assessment roll and the first posting or publication of the notice thereof as required by law.” Said article 11, in section 251 of the act, directs that the petition for the .writ must be presented within fifteen days after the completion and filing of the assessment roll and the first posting or publication of the notice thereof.” Section 42 of the Tax Law (added by Laws of 1899, chap. '712, and amd. by Laws of 1904, chap. 382) makes provision for the entry, by local assessors in their assessrhent rolls of special franchise assessments of the State Board of Tax Commissioners.

[505]*505The filing of the assessment roll and the posting and publication of notice of such filing, as referred to in said sections 45 and 251 of the Tax Law, are commanded in section 38 thereof (as amd. by Laws of 1904, chap. 279), as follows: “ In cities the assessment roll when thus completed and verified' shall be filed on or before September first in the office of the city cleric, there to remain for fifteen days for public inspection. The assessors shall forthwith cause a notice to be posted conspicuously in at least three public places in the tax district, and to be published in one or more newspapers, if any, published in the city, that such assessment roll has been finally completed and stating that it has been so filed and will be open to public inspection.” Such requirement follows immediately after the provisions for the review and correction of the assessment roll by the ' assessors after notice to all persons aggrieved as contained in sections 35, 36 and 37 of the act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stevens Medical Arts Building v. City of Mount Vernon
72 A.D.2d 177 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Wilkins v. Zelichowski
140 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
State Insurance Fund v. Boyland
203 Misc. 741 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
People ex rel. Powott Corp. v. Woodworth
172 Misc. 791 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
People ex rel. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Hoesterey
248 A.D. 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
In re Rochester Investors Co.
248 A.D. 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
People ex rel. Hoesterey v. Taylor
210 A.D. 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
People ex rel. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co. v. Woodbury
126 N.Y.S. 1143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D. 503, 117 N.Y.S. 676, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-western-new-york-pennsylvania-railway-co-v-woodbury-nyappdiv-1909.