People ex rel. Wentsley v. Hammock
This text of 89 A.D.2d 1058 (People ex rel. Wentsley v. Hammock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent Parole Board appeals from a judgment which granted a writ of habeas corpus to petitioner because it failed to give petitioner 14 days’ notice of the date of an adjourned hearing. Petitioner does not contest his receipt of 14 days’ notice of the initial parole revocation hearing pursuant to section 259-i (subd 3, par [f], cl [iii]) of the Executive Law. There is no requirement that an additional 14 days’ notice be given for a rescheduled or adjourned final parole revocation hearing (People ex rel. Haskins v Waters, 87 AD2d 657). Such a requirement would undermine the Legislature’s manifest concern for promptness in disposing of charges of parole violation (see People ex rel. Knowles v Smith, 54 NY2d 259, 265). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J. — habeas corpus.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule,'JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.2d 1058, 454 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-wentsley-v-hammock-nyappdiv-1982.