People ex rel. Weiss v. Reid

65 A.D.2d 560, 408 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13205
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 A.D.2d 560 (People ex rel. Weiss v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Weiss v. Reid, 65 A.D.2d 560, 408 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13205 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 17, 1977, as failed to set forth his earliest release date. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The appellant calculates his earliest possible release date as October or December, 1977, while respondents calculate the date as November 26, 1978. The appellant mistakenly attributes the difference to the respondents’ failure to credit him with certain jail time to which he was entitled. That time was, in fact, credited to the appellant. The problem actually arises because the appellant has incorrectly chosen May 23, 1974, [561]*561the date of imposition of an indeterminate four-year sentence in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, as his starting point when he should have used July 10, 1975, the date on which a sentence of up to seven years was imposed on the appellant in the Supreme Court, Queens County. The seven-year sentence is controlling under section 70.30 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Penal Law, since that is the concurrent term "which has the longest unexpired time to run” (cf. Matter of Kalamis v Smith, 42 NY2d 191, 196). Respondents correctly base their determination on the date on which that sentence was imposed since the appellant was presumably already in the custody of a State correctional facility at that time. Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Latham v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
296 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 A.D.2d 560, 408 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-weiss-v-reid-nyappdiv-1978.