People ex rel. Weinstein v. Zucca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Weinstein v. Zucca

150 A.D. 194, 134 N.Y.S. 693, 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7082

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 150 A.D. 194 (People ex rel. Weinstein v. Zucca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Weinstein v. Zucca, 150 A.D. 194, 134 N.Y.S. 693, 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Scott, J.:

There is no question in this case as to the jurisdiction of the board of assessors or of the regularity of their proceedings. We are, therefore, of the opinion, for the reasons stated in People ex rel. Olin v. Hennessy (150 App. Div. 190), decided herewith, that we are without power to review the determination.

We have, however, looked into the record, with the result that we are satisfied that, if we had the power, we should not interfere with the determination sought to be reviewed.

The writ must, therefore, be dismissed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke and Dowling, JJ., concurred.

Writ dismissed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI