People ex rel. Weathersby v. Smith
115 A.D.2d 315, 496 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54588
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1985·Published
Opinion
Judg[316] ment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The hearing officer properly complied with 7 NYCRR 254.5 (b) in determining that petitioner’s witnesses should testify out of his presence (see, People ex rel. Bradley v Smith, 115 AD2d 225). Special Term properly found no violation of 7 NYCRR 254.7 (c). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Flynn, J. —habeas corpus.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Weathersby v. Smith, 115 A.D.2d 315, 496 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
115 A.D.2d 315 (People ex rel. Weathersby v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Bradley v. Smith
115 A.D.2d 225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)