People ex rel. Washington v. Higgins

207 A.D.2d 961, 617 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10127

This text of 207 A.D.2d 961 (People ex rel. Washington v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Washington v. Higgins, 207 A.D.2d 961, 617 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that the denial of relator’s request to post bail in the form of a partially secured security bond (see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230, 232) did not constitute an abuse of discretion (see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, supra, at 232). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Habeas Corpus.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 A.D.2d 961, 617 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-washington-v-higgins-nyappdiv-1994.