People ex rel. Ward v. Purroy

18 N.Y.S. 953, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 49
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided March 7, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

To entitle appellant to reargument of the appeal herein, it must be made to appear that some question, decisive of the case, and which was presented by counsel upon the argument, has been overlooked by the ■court, or that the decision is inconsistent with some statute, or with a controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not drawn through ■the neglect or inadvertence of counsel, (rule 16 of the general term of this •court;) and, as there is not even a pretense that either of the foregoing grounds exists, this motion must be denied. Motion for reargument denied, ■with $10 "costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Ward v. Purroy, 18 N.Y.S. 953, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 49 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

18 N.Y.S. 953 (People ex rel. Ward v. Purroy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.