People ex rel. Ward v. Artuz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Ward v. Artuz

259 A.D.2d 644, 691 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 644 (People ex rel. Ward v. Artuz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Ward v. Artuz, 259 A.D.2d 644, 691 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated January 13, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s [645]*645assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The petitioner has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated January 13, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s [645]*645assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The petitioner has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 644, 691 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-ward-v-artuz-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack