People ex rel. Walker v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Walker v. Senkowski

205 A.D.2d 813, 615 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 813 (People ex rel. Walker v. Senkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Walker v. Senkowski, 205 A.D.2d 813, 615 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered May 13, 1993 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

We reject petitioner’s contention that Supreme Court erred in denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. As the court noted, habeas corpus is not a proper procedure for raising issues which were or could have been addressed either [814]*814on direct appeal or pursuant to CPL article 440. Here, petitioner’s arguments in support of his application could have been raised when he appealed his conviction or in his postverdict CPL article 440 motions. In addition, upon reviewing his allegations we find no reason to depart from traditional orderly procedure.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered May 13, 1993 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

We reject petitioner’s contention that Supreme Court erred in denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. As the court noted, habeas corpus is not a proper procedure for raising issues which were or could have been addressed either [814]*814on direct appeal or pursuant to CPL article 440. Here, petitioner’s arguments in support of his application could have been raised when he appealed his conviction or in his postverdict CPL article 440 motions. In addition, upon reviewing his allegations we find no reason to depart from traditional orderly procedure.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 813, 615 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-walker-v-senkowski-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack