People ex rel. Walker v. Fay

24 A.D.2d 762, 263 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3325

This text of 24 A.D.2d 762 (People ex rel. Walker v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Walker v. Fay, 24 A.D.2d 762, 263 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered November 24, 1964, which dismissed the writ after a hearing, and remanded him to the custody of respondent. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Habeas corpus is not the proper remedy for testing the sufficiency of an indictment under the circumstances of this case (People ex rel. Wachowicz v. Martin, 293 N. Y. 361, 366). However, we have reviewed relator’s contentions and find that the indictment is sufficient (People v. Langford, 16 N Y 2d 32). Beldó ck, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Wachowicz v. Martin
57 N.E.2d 53 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 762, 263 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-walker-v-fay-nyappdiv-1965.