People ex rel. von Schmidt v. Bednosky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. von Schmidt v. Bednosky

223 A.D.2d 518, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7062

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 223 A.D.2d 518 (People ex rel. von Schmidt v. Bednosky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. von Schmidt v. Bednosky, 223 A.D.2d 518, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Suffolk County Indictment No. 1368-95, or, in the alternative, to release the defendant on his own recognizance.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Kruger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Suffolk County Indictment No. 1368-95, or, in the alternative, to release the defendant on his own recognizance.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Kruger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 518, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-von-schmidt-v-bednosky-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack