People ex rel. Vickery v. Walsh

100 A.D.3d 1116, 952 N.Y.S.2d 914
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 8, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 100 A.D.3d 1116 (People ex rel. Vickery v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Vickery v. Walsh, 100 A.D.3d 1116, 952 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered August 24, 2011 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner, an inmate, made an application for a writ of habeas corpus alleging various constitutional violations and seeking release from prison. Supreme Court signed the writ, which directed petitioner to serve the writ and the petition on, among others, respondent and the Attorney General on or before December 3, 2010. Petitioner failed to do so, and the court subsequently dismissed the petition on jurisdictional grounds, without a hearing, also noting as an alternative ground for denial that petitioner’s arguments could have been raised upon a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction or in a collateral motion. Petitioner appeals.

We affirm. There was no showing that petitioner’s imprisonment presented an obstacle beyond his control preventing compliance with the service directives and, thus, dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction was proper (see People ex rel. Watson v Walsh, 7 AD3d 850, 850 [2004]). Further, habeas corpus relief is unavailable where petitioner could have raised his constitutional claims on direct appeal or in a collateral motion (see People ex rel. Brown v Artus, 64 AD3d 1064, 1064 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 709 [2009]).

Peters, EJ., Rose, Spain, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Figueroa v. Griffin
134 A.D.3d 1318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People ex rel. Vickery v. Griffin
125 A.D.3d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.3d 1116, 952 N.Y.S.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-vickery-v-walsh-nyappdiv-2012.