People Ex Rel. Van Rensselaer Estates, Inc. v. Goldfogle
This text of 33 N.E.2d 250 (People Ex Rel. Van Rensselaer Estates, Inc. v. Goldfogle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of Appellate Division in so far as appealed from by defendants afiSrmed, with costs to relator-appellant; and in so far as appealed from by the relator order of the Appellate Division reversed and the proceeding remitted to Special Term, to proceed in accordance with the ruling in *584 People ex rel. Manhattan Square Beresford, Inc., v. Sexton (284 N. Y. 145), with costs in all courts to the relator-appellant. The court was not justified in finding a valuation of the building for the year 1931 and subsequent years higher than the reproduction cost thereof less depreciation as shown by the evidence, in the absence of extraordinary circumstances not present here. No opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 N.E.2d 250, 285 N.Y. 582, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-van-rensselaer-estates-inc-v-goldfogle-ny-1941.